Anti-migrant rally in Poland (VIDEO)

A massive rally against pro-migrant government policies and what has been dubbed the “Islamic flooding” of the country took place in the southwestern Polish city of Katowice.

Over 25,000 people were expected to take to streets in a protest against an influx of refugees and migrants from the Middle East and North Africa, according to reports in local media ahead of the rally.

The demonstration, organized by a nationalist organization called All Polish Youth, comes after a decision by Poland’s authorities to accept some 2,000 refugees from Syria and North Africa by 2017.

“All Polish Youth expresses its strong opposition to the actions taken by the Polish government since it blindly does everything Brussels and Berlin say,” Michał Nowak, representative of All Polish Youth, said.

“Polish media do not cover the situation accurately, saying that the majority of refugees, who are actually economic migrants, are women and children. In fact, 75% of those people are young men, according to the UN statistics,” he declared.

The protesters who walked down the streets carrying Polish flags and placards reading “Poland is for us” or “No to extremism,” condemned the situation and blamed the government for turning their backs on the needs of Polish people.

Przemyslaw Wipler and Janusz Korwin-Mikke, members of the liberal Polish political party Coalition of Polish Republic’s Renewal Freedom and Hope (KORWiN), were also among the protesters.

Korwin-Mikke, who is the chairman of KORWiN, compared Europe to a rotting tree and refugees to parasites at a party convention on Saturday.

“The parasites are not to blame, however, the trees are actually at fault,” said the politician.

A number of other cities in Poland saw similar demonstrations.

Despite the decision that angered the All Polish Youth organization, Warsaw seems somewhat reluctant to take on the additional refugees that could be imposed on it by the obligatory quotas on which the EU has been insisting. Poland’s foreign minister Grzegorz Schetyna said on Monday that, while the country could accept up to 9,000 new refugees or even more under the European Union quota plan, he would prefer to see the bloc’s borders sealed. He also said such decisions should be voluntary.

This is not the first time Poles have gathered to protest pro-migrant policies. A wave of protests swept across Warsaw not long ago, when several hundred people took to the streets back in July of this year.

Europe is currently struggling with an unprecedented influx of refugees fleeing from war-torn regions in the Middle East and North Africa, and natives are showing their dissatisfaction even in football matches…

I just hope things don’t get too heated up and start turning violent, for the sake of everyone involved. As I said before, I believe migrants are just peons in a globalist agenda. I wish for everyone to live in peace, safe and happy in their own homes.

And little something from an actual #Syrian,


Is the #RefugeeCrisis being taken too lightly by the #EU?

Note: First of all, I want to let something clear, I do not believe that muslims are at fault with everything thats been happening. I think they are just being victims of a globalist agenda. Obviously there are good and bad people in every country and religion. 

People from third world countries don’t think the same way developed country citizens think. Proof of it is seen in the way they live their lives (their culture). And you don’t need to be an anthropologist to figure these things out. In third world countries, religion plays an important aspect in determining their beliefs, arts, morals, laws, and customs. Culture in Middle Eastern counties, part of South Asia and North Africa is based on the powerful influence Islam exerts in people’s lives. Islamic law touches on virtually every aspect of life and society, providing guidance on multifarious topics from banking and welfare, to family life and the environment. Islam (Muslim) schools are dividen in two denominationsSunni (75–90%) or Shia (10–20%). About 13% of Muslims live in Indonesia, 25% in South Asia, 20% in the Middle East, and 15% in Sub-Saharan Africa.  It is the second-largest religion by number of adherents and, according to many sources, the fastest-growing major religion in the world.


In some Muslim countries, the law requires women to cover either just legs, shoulders and head or the whole body apart from the face. In strictest countries, the face as well must be covered leaving just a mesh to see through. These rules for dressing cause tensions, concerning particularly Muslims living in Western countries, where restrictions are considered both sexist and oppressive. In Syria women are now entitled to receive the same education as men and to seek employment, but the traditional attitude that views females as inferior beings prevails. A woman is considered the possession of a man rather than her own person. She is identified as her father’s daughter until marriage; after the birth of a male child, her identity is transferred from the wife of her husband to the mother of her son. Since Children are highly valued as a blessing from God, the more children they have they believe the more fortunate they will be considered.

In the other hand there are the different European countries, each with a culture of its own, but similar in the way women are respected as equal to men. We have the Scandinavian countries, some of the richest, most successful societies on Earth, with exceptionally high levels of education, health care, and safety, but all of this is being shaken down by floods of immigrants.

Here is a video of a Sweden woman speaking up because of this:

There are also tons of news about a school located in Pocking, Bavaria, who sent a letter to parents advising them of new “security measures” after a migrant shelter was opened at the school’s nearby gym. Parents were warned that their children should not wear revealing clothes for fear of “misunderstandings” that could lead to “attacks” by the migrants. Children were also told that “derogatory or racial remarks” would not be tolerated. Meanwhile a 7-year-old girl was raped by a north African migrant in a German park last week, a story that has received little media attention. And now, since Sweden opened its doors to mass immigration, the country has become the rape capital of the west, with cases skyrocketing by 1400%. Around 77.6% of the rapists are identified as “foreigners”.

Muslim rape culture has become a major problem in Scandinavia but its critics have been labeled racist and Islamophobic. And now The United Kingdom, which is also set to accept a further 20,000 refugees, has also seen numerous cases of Muslim rape gangs, including a sex trafficking ring in Rotherham that was covered up by local councilors and the police over fears that identifying the culprits – almost all of whom were Pakistani men – would be seen as politically incorrect.

And if the issues about the women and children being raped weren’t scandalous enough, vandalising their way through Europe, robbing charitable donors, and creating tension and uneasiness for the locals are just the appetisers before the main course.

Now I´ve been wondering, with each day even more and more people questioning themselves: what will be the outcome of such a large scale immigration? Have things been handled the best possible way? Weren’t there other solutions besides “absorbing” the refugees? What will become of the countries with such large influx of migrants? Wasn’t the invitation to the refugees a little bit premature? And so on, Is the #RefugeeCrisis being taken too lightly by the #EU? Because you can only judge by the consequences and these are only pointing out the negligence in preventing a humanitarian crisis from occurring

Read more:

humanitarian crisis (or “humanitarian disaster”) is defined as a singular event or a series of events that are threatening in terms of health, safety or well being of a community or large group of people. It may be an internal or external conflict and usually occurs throughout a large land area.

Video exposes “clock kid” story as a deceptive stunt.

A man debunked the official story behind the “Clock Kid” by building a near-exact copy of Ahmed Mohamed’s clock in about 20 seconds using the guts of a store-bought clock and a briefcase.

As the story goes, Ahmed, a 14-year-old Muslim high school student in Irving, Texas, took his “homemade” clock to school to impress his engineering teacher and was arrested after another teacher thought the clock was a bomb.

“This video challenges that the clock was homemade by showing a nearly identical package being prepared in about 20 seconds,” the video’s description reads.

The clock in the video is a near-perfect clone of the clock Ahmed took to class, including the 9V battery hook-up, the wall cord and the snooze button.

In other words, Ahmed didn’t build a clock but rather ripped the guts out of a store-bought clock and shoved them into a suitcase he took to school.

Ahmed’s clock was likely a Micronta 63-765A sold by Radio Shack in the 1970s, according to Anthony DiPasquale, an electronics expert art

“The shape and design is a dead give away… The large screen… The buttons on the front laid out horizontally would have been on a separate board – a large snooze button, four control buttons, and two switches to turn the alarm on and off, and choose two brightness levels,” he wrote. “The clock features a 9v battery back-up, and a switch on the rear allows the owner to choose between 12 and 24 hour time (features like a battery back-up, and a 24 hour time selection seems awful superfluous for a hobby project, don’t you think?)”

“Oh, and that ‘M’ logo on the circuit board mentioned above? Micronta.”

It’s unlikely a hobbyist would silkscreen company logos and part numbers on the circuit boards in a homemade clock, DiPasquale added.

“It’s pretty safe to say already we’re looking at ’70s tech, mass produced in a factory,” he concluded.

What’s really telling is how the mainstream media is running to Ahmed’s defense despite the overwhelming evidence debunking his story.

“Whether Ahmed ‘invented’ a clock or merely reassembled the various components of what was already a clock is really beside the point,” Robby Soave at claimed. “Frankly, it just doesn’t matter; of course a 14-year-old is going to use the word ‘invention’ a little more loosely than the U.S. Patent Office.”

Of course it matters because Amhed’s father, Mohamed El-Hassan Mohamed, is a well-known Muslim apologist who has previously been involved in other stunts to call people out for being “Islamiphobic” and the evidence suggests the Mohameds reassembled the clock to look like a suitcase bomb so they could claim Ahmed was “racially profiled.”

“If the parents were involved in the hoax, now you now have a fraud going on because money has been collected on false pretenses,” former New Jersey Superior Court Judge Andrew Napolitano said, referring to the gifts and scholarships Ahmed has since received.

Is Freedom of Speech being targeted?

Another victim of social networks shutting down their account (in this case was Facebook) for speaking out their minds was 13-year-old CJ Pearson from Georgia. Now, I do not necessarily agree with him in everything he says, but I encourage people to speak up their minds a bit more.

I believe this type of videos should be the ones breaking down the internet, and not Kim Kardashians ass…

Pearson focuses on the story of Obama inviting a muslim student to the White House after the kid was arrested in Texas for making a clock, which officials initially thought was a bomb.

Calling Obama “ignorant,” “incompetent” unable to grasp reality, Pearson notes that while the kid got an open invite from Obama, the families of gunned down cops and those killed by illegal immigrants are simply ignored.

“Mr. President, when Kate Steinle was gunned down by an illegal immigrant you didn’t do anything — you didn’t call the family or invite them to the White House. Is that okay? I don’t think so, Mr. President,” Pearson urges.

“And to go even further, Mr. President, when cops are being gunned down, you’re not inviting their families to the White House. You never did.” Pearson adds.

“But when a Muslim kid builds a clock? ‘Oh, come on by.’ What is this world you’re living in?” he asks the president.

Pearson continued the rant by referring to the Dylan Roof shooting.

“You know, when the shooting in Chattanooga happened, it took you longer to lower the flag than it took you to light the White House in rainbow colors after the Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage,” he vents.

Pearson charges that the public perception of Obama’s inviting the muslim kid to the White House “fits into your agenda,” noting “That’s great for you.”

“But Mr. President, these people were gunned down. Kate Steinle was innocent. This man was deported but it was a sanctuary city so he was able to roam free.” Pearson further explains.

“Cops are being gunned down every single day because of your actions, Mr. President. Because you’re seeking to appease terrorists — domestic terrorists — and those domestic terrorists are the Black Lives Matter movement.” the middle schooler declares.

“And you think, Mr. President, that I’m going to respect you if you don’t respect the brave men and women and innocent people who lost their lives because of your incompetence. I’m sick and tired of it and I know the American people are, too,” Pearson concludes.

Pearson is executive director of a group called “Young Georgians in Government.

His Facebook page says he is “committed to fighting for conservative principles and engaging young people in the political process.”

“Most young people really don’t have an interest in government or politics, but we need to pique that interest, we need to make sure that they know, the decisions politicians make are going to affect them,” the student told ABC 6 in a profile story last December.

Pearson’s rants have become popular online.


Bullying and Social Darwinism. What is wrong with our society?

First, I want to copy/paste some definitions:

Bullying is the use of force, threat, or coercion to abuseintimidate, or aggressively dominate others. The behavior is often repeated and habitual. One essential prerequisite is the perception, by the bully or by others, of an imbalance of social or physical power, which distinguishes bullying from conflict.[1] Behaviours used to assert such domination can include verbal harassment or threat, physical assault or coercion, and such acts may be directed repeatedly towards particular targets. Rationalisations for such behavior sometimes include differences of social class, race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, appearance, behavior, body language, personality, reputation, lineage, strength, size or ability.[2][3] If bullying is done by a group, it is called mobbing.[4]

Bullying can be defined in many different ways and it´s divided into four basic types of abuse – emotional (sometimes called relational), verbalphysical, and cyber.[7] It typically involves subtle methods of coercion, such as intimidation. It ranges from simple one-on-one bullying to more complex bullying in which the bully may have one or more “lieutenants” who may seem to be willing to assist the primary bully in his or her bullying activities. Bullying in school and the workplace is also referred to as peer abuse.[8] A bullying culture can develop in any context in which humans interact with each other. This includes school, family, the workplace, home, and neighbourhoods. – Wikipedia

Social Darwinism is a modern name given to various theories of society that emerged in the United KingdomNorth America, and Western Europe in the 1870s, which claim to apply biological concepts of natural selection and survival of the fittest to sociology and politics.[1][2] Economically, social Darwinists argue that the strong should see their wealth and power increase while the weak should see their wealth and power decrease. Different social Darwinists have differing views about which groups of people are considered to be the strong and which groups of people are considered to be the weak, and they also hold different opinions about the precise mechanism that should be used to reward strength and punish weakness. Many such views stress competition between individuals in laissez-faire capitalism, while others are claimed to have motivated ideas of eugenicsracismimperialism,[3] fascismNazism, and struggle between national or racial groups. – Wikipedia

Now, can you see where I am going? Can anyone notice a resemblance? Do you agree that bullies believe themselves to be better tan others (their victims)? Could it be that bullies act that way just because they think they deserve more than others based on perceived so called differences? Isn’t this what social darwinism is about? Do you want to knowingly continue to live in a society where competition and survival of the fittest make the rules of cohabitation? Do you think its fair for cultural groups to attack others based on their differences? Isn’t this what all radical groups do?

As I see it, if we continue highlighting our differences, be them social, economical, racial, religious, gender, appearance, sexual orientation, behaviour, body language, personality, reputation, lineage, strength, size or ability, If we continue living on a society that emphasises that the difference between one-another is what makes you valuable and not the fact that you are just a living human being, if we continue believing we are not all brothers and sisters from the same planet, someone will always exploit you based on those stereotypes that make you an easy target of propaganda and thought manipulation. So I would like to invite every being who reads this to not think of yourself and others as stereotypes, but as living entities, brothers and sisters from our same planet. Lets all get along.

Dear Fat People… Tolerance!

tol·er·ance ˈtäl(ə)rəns/
noun. †he ability or willingness to tolerate something, in particular the existence of opinions or behaviours that one does not necessarily agree with. – Wikipedia.
It does not mean that you embrace everything that everybody says, it means that you tolerate what they say and you are free to debate them on an equal platform… Paul Joseph Watson

Lately all I read about on the different #SocialMedia platforms denotes a battle concerning #FreedomOfSpeech. Since the #DolceandGabbana incident, many many more less famous people have been gang hate attacked because of their perspectives on all types of subjects. The diversity ranges from Lauren Southern on #Rape Culture or Radical #Feminism, to Nicole Arbour on #Obesity. You may read the different backlashes and join the hate gang or you may actually see the videos and form your own opinions about them.

Is her way of expressing her opinion violent in any way? Do you believe she is being disrespectful or harmful? Here she talks about the repercussions caused by people who aren’t tolerant enough.

A bit more…

Now about Nicole Arbour. Here you have her ¨controvercial¨ video.

So, about ¨Fat-shaming¨…

And here is what mainstream Media does…

Wow, 5 agains 1, is that even fair? Now the point isn’t if she is funny or not, Arbour’s opinion is just that: an opinion. It’s backed by the first amendment, just like your own thoughts and opinions. She, like everyone else, has the right to express her thoughts  and she welcomes you to express them as well, even when they are against her. So no one who issues a judgment against her or any other person expressing their thoughts is any better than them. The fact is that there will always be people who are going to get offended, we are about 7.125 Billion (2013) people on this planet, and it´s statistically imposible to please everybody. Now, should we call that borderline bulling? Thats ridiculous, its just an open statement about how obesity is bad for you, or how radical feminism is just, too radical. If it saves or kills people as some put it, it´s just a matter of low self-esteem. Yes, it is obvious that we should all love our bodies as we are, but careless obesity is the total oposite, you are being negligent about your body and it is bad for you health.

My point is, you may actually be or not on the same page as some, but that doesn’t justify that trolls gang up and attack someone just because they don’t think the same way some people do. And to prove that not everybody hate it, Arbour won thousands of followers. The healthiest way around this discussions will always be to just ignore the issues you do not agree with, because you always have a choice: to be a childish hater or a grown up and just walk away.


“I got sick with an autoimmune disease that’s a pain disorder and I made the conscious decision to shut down my successful company of ten years. I spent five days in my artist friend’s studio just watching the process of her painting and how she wiped the paint off on her pants. My hands are really affected by this disease and they give me a lot of pain. Strangely enough, when I wasn’t feeling well—mentally or physically—I wanted to paint. It was extremely therapeutic. So when I finally started hand-painting these jeans, I knew they had to benefit children in hospitals, making sure that these art therapy programs are fully funded.”

—Erin Feniger, New York, New York


Take a look at these beauties in